Economy Category

NYS Tax “Cap” Meaningless

July 15th, 2008 by Mike in All Posts, Budget, Economy

The “tax cap” currently being discussed by our dysfunctional NYS Legislators is a scam on NYS taxpayers. Here are four reasons:

1. It is NOT a cap.

2. It reflects property taxes - NOT school budgets.

3. The higher NYS Aid to Education, the more the local property tax burden can be reduced.

4. 55% of the school budget voters can override the 4% property tax increase.

Let’s look at each reason in more detail.

1. NOT A CAP: The proposal recommends a 4% property tax INCREASE PER YEAR. A legitimate “property tax cap” would be based on a percentage of property assessed value. With this proposal, your property tax can continue to increase at a very healthly 4% compounded annually. In five years, a 4% annual increase results in a 21.6% increase!

2. NO SCHOOL BUDGET CONTROL: This proposal does not control school budget increases. School budgets can increase based on NYS Aid To Education while the property tax increase is held to 4%. See #3.

3. NYS AID TO EDUCATION: School budgets reflect a SPENDING plan. Revenue to support the spending plan is derived from:

  • Sales Tax
  • Investment Income
  • Rentals
  • Other Income
  • Fund Balance
  • and the BIGGY….NYS Aid To Education

Then, subtracting all of the above items results in a balance that must be paid by the Property Tax Levy.

Therefore, the more NYS Aid To Education, the less the Property Tax Levy.

The problem: YOU pay for NYS Aid To Education through your NYS income tax.

Legislators often state they will only support the “cap” IF Aid To Education is maintained or increased. So your NYS income tax goes UP while your local property tax may hold at a 4% annual increase.

By the way, NYS Aid to Brighton INCREASED 12.2% in 2008/09 and 17.4% in 2007/08. HUGE increases that held down the property tax increase.

4. 55% VOTER OVERRIDE: During the last Monroe County school budget voting, only one district had less than 55% of the voters approve their budgets. And that one district was at 54%.

This proposed 4% “cap” is a “feel-good” idea that will have little, if any effect on putting a damper on your total NYS tax burden.

No comments yet. Click to comment.


Upstate NY makes Top Ten Population LOSERS

July 13th, 2008 by Mike in All Posts, Economy

Per USAToday, July 10, 2008 (Page 2A), the top 10 cities with more than 100,000 residents LOSING population from 2000 to 2007 are:

  • Cleveland, OH
  • Flint, MI
  • Pittsburgh
  • Buffalo (down 6.8%)
  • Dayton, OH
  • Hialeah, FL
  • Toledo, OH
  • Rochester, NY (down 5.9%)
  • Birmingham, AL
  • Syracuse, NY (down 5.0%)

Do you think that property taxes played a significant role? Job losses are a casualty of high taxes and when the jobs leave…the people move. Retirees move to locations with lower taxes.

A more hidden effect of this propulation loss is that the people who are leaving are those with OPTIONS. They tend to be residents with skills, education and financial means.

Another effect is that these people paid taxes…property, income and sales taxes. With 5.9% of the Rochester population gone, the governmental and school tax burden does NOT go down. It is simply re-distributed to those of us that are STILL HERE!

Three western NY cities with top 10 population loss? Not a good sign for our economic future!

2 comments. Click to add your comment.